Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EVBLX vs RSFLX
EVBLX vs RSFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EVBLX vs. RSFLX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVBLX is a Hold and RSFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EVBLX has more cash in the bank: 4.1B vs. RSFLX (405M). RSFLX pays higher dividends than EVBLX: RSFLX (9.59) vs EVBLX (7.62). EVBLX was incepted earlier than RSFLX: EVBLX (22 years) vs RSFLX (16 years). RSFLX (1.12) is less costly to investors than EVBLX (1.06). RSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. EVBLX (31.00). EVBLX initial investment is less costly to investors than RSFLX (2%) vs RSFLX (2%). EVBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSFLX: EVBLX (1000) vs RSFLX (2500). RSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. EVBLX (5.99). EVBLX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. RSFLX (30.12).
| EVBLX | RSFLX | EVBLX / RSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.00 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.12 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.921 | 3.793 | 51% |
| Front Load | 3% | 2% | 144% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 405M | 1,013% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.62 | 9.59 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.99 | 8.88 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.25 | 24.46 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 30.12 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.59 | 50.93 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement