EVGRF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.75B
FMS
Price
$23.07
Change
-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.2B
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EVGRF vs FMS

Header iconEVGRF vs FMS Comparison
Open Charts EVGRF vs FMSBanner chart's image
CHINA EVERGRANDE NEW ENERGY VEH GROUP
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization2.75B
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$23.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Volume$160.85K
Capitalization11.2B
EVGRF vs FMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
EVGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EVGRF vs. FMS commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVGRF is a Hold and FMS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (EVGRF: $0.02 vs. FMS: $23.07)
Brand notoriety: EVGRF and FMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EVGRF: 128% vs. FMS: 65%
Market capitalization -- EVGRF: $2.75B vs. FMS: $11.2B
EVGRF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $2.75B. FMS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $11.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EVGRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EVGRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EVGRF and FMS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EVGRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EVGRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FMS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the short-term than EVGRF.

Price Growth

EVGRF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +66.67% price change this week, while FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+4.05% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($11.2B) has a higher market cap than EVGRF($2.75B). EVGRF YTD gains are higher at: 40.000 vs. FMS (1.899). FMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.21B vs. EVGRF (-3.47B). EVGRF has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FMS (1.54B). FMS has less debt than EVGRF: FMS (12.1B) vs EVGRF (73B). FMS has higher revenues than EVGRF: FMS (19.5B) vs EVGRF (15.5B).
EVGRFFMSEVGRF / FMS
Capitalization2.75B11.2B25%
EBITDA-3.47B3.21B-108%
Gain YTD40.0001.8992,106%
P/E RatioN/A20.80-
Revenue15.5B19.5B79%
Total Cash10.5B1.54B682%
Total Debt73B12.1B603%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMS: Fundamental Ratings
FMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EVGRFFMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EVGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIDI25.140.18
+0.71%
Vident International Equity Strategy ETF
IJR117.990.62
+0.53%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
RAAX29.540.08
+0.26%
VanEck Real Assets ETF
PVI24.890.02
+0.08%
Invesco Floating Rate MunicipalIncomeETF
IBTH22.20-0.01
-0.05%
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Tr ETF

EVGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVGRF has been loosely correlated with DNTCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EVGRF jumps, then DNTCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EVGRF
1D Price
Change %
EVGRF100%
+66.67%
DNTCF - EVGRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
FMS - EVGRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
FMCQF - EVGRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
DVA - EVGRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
AGL - EVGRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
More