It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EVH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.75% price change this week, while PINC (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.67%.
EVH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
PINC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
EVH | PINC | EVH / PINC | |
Capitalization | 3.64B | 2.58B | 141% |
EBITDA | -24.79M | 374M | -7% |
Gain YTD | -0.178 | 3.364 | -5% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.48 | - |
Revenue | 1.96B | 1.32B | 149% |
Total Cash | 193M | 371M | 52% |
Total Debt | 645M | 169M | 382% |
EVH | PINC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINC's Valuation (5) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVH (57) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVH’s over the last 12 months.
EVH's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PINC (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that EVH’s stock grew similarly to PINC’s over the last 12 months.
PINC's SMR Rating (85) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as EVH (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew similarly to EVH’s over the last 12 months.
EVH's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PINC (52) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that EVH’s stock grew similarly to PINC’s over the last 12 months.
EVH's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for PINC (81) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that EVH’s stock grew significantly faster than PINC’s over the last 12 months.
EVH | PINC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 2 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 2 days ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 2 days ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago79% | 8 days ago49% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 2 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 2 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 2 days ago49% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVH has been loosely correlated with AKAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EVH jumps, then AKAM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EVH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EVH | 100% | -0.53% | ||
AKAM - EVH | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
DOCS - EVH | 47% Loosely correlated | -5.03% | ||
ADEA - EVH | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
RIOT - EVH | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
COIN - EVH | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINC has been loosely correlated with GDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINC jumps, then GDC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PINC | 100% | -0.60% | ||
GDC - PINC | 61% Loosely correlated | +7.16% | ||
TDC - PINC | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
DOX - PINC | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
CVLT - PINC | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.46% | ||
MQ - PINC | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More |