Ad is loading...
EWA vs GXG
EWA vs GXG Comparison
Open Charts EWA vs GXG
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Price$23.73
Change+$0.29 (+1.24%)
Volume$14.02K
Net Assets1.42B
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
Price$28.09
Change+$0.59 (+2.15%)
Volume$126
Net Assets87.32M
EWA vs GXG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWA vs. GXG commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWA is a Hold and GXG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWA has more net assets: 1.42B vs. GXG (87.3M). GXG has a higher annual dividend yield than EWA: GXG (20.614) vs EWA (-1.760). EWA was incepted earlier than GXG: EWA (29 years) vs GXG (16 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than GXG (0.62). GXG has a higher turnover EWA (5.00) vs EWA (5.00).
| EWA | GXG | EWA / GXG | |
| Gain YTD | -1.760 | 20.614 | -9% |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 87.3M | 1,622% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.62 | 81% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 38.17 | 13% |
| Yield | 3.78 | 5.10 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWA | GXG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GXG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXG has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXG jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXG | 100% | +1.74% | ||
| CIB - GXG | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| GPRK - GXG | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| AVAL - GXG | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| EC - GXG | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| TGLS - GXG | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||