EWA | GXG | EWA / GXG | |
Gain YTD | 5.604 | 5.673 | 99% |
Net Assets | 1.48B | 35.7M | 4,137% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 4.00 | 50.35 | 8% |
Yield | 3.67 | 6.48 | 57% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
EWA | GXG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 24 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 2 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXG has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXG jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GXG | 100% | -0.17% | ||
CIB - GXG | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
GPRK - GXG | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
AVAL - GXG | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
EC - GXG | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
TGLS - GXG | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.93% | ||
More |