EWA | GXG | EWA / GXG | |
Gain YTD | 7.079 | 0.616 | 1,150% |
Net Assets | 1.44B | 35.2M | 4,099% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 4.00 | 50.35 | 8% |
Yield | 3.67 | 6.48 | 57% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
EWA | GXG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago82% | 5 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXG has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXG jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GXG | 100% | +1.02% | ||
CIB - GXG | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
GPRK - GXG | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
AVAL - GXG | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
EC - GXG | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
TGLS - GXG | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More |