EWA | VNAM | EWA / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 12.682 | 17.578 | 72% |
Net Assets | 1.62B | 14.4M | 11,222% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 13.16 | 38% |
Yield | 3.09 | 1.02 | 302% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 4 years | - |
EWA | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 2 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNAM and CMG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNAM and CMG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | +0.70% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
APH - VNAM | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
SAM - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
GIL - VNAM | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
More |