EWA | VNAM | EWA / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 6.828 | -6.494 | -105% |
Net Assets | 1.48B | 11.8M | 12,500% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 4.00 | 44.49 | 9% |
Yield | 3.67 | 0.46 | 802% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 3 years | - |
EWA | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago85% | 8 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 2 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNAM and SSB have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNAM and SSB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | -0.05% | ||
SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
APH - VNAM | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
SAM - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
GIL - VNAM | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
HDB - VNAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
More |