EWA | VNAM | EWA / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 2.724 | 1.756 | 155% |
Net Assets | 1.48B | 10.4M | 14,240% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 13.16 | 38% |
Yield | 3.78 | 0.94 | 402% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 3 years | - |
EWA | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNAM and CMG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNAM and CMG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | -0.17% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.52% | ||
SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | -2.66% | ||
APH - VNAM | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
SAM - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
GIL - VNAM | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More |