EWBC
Price
$93.61
Change
+$1.95 (+2.13%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
11.08B
33 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$36.06
Change
-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWBC vs IFS

Header iconEWBC vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts EWBC vs IFSBanner chart's image
East West Ban
Price$93.61
Change+$1.95 (+2.13%)
Volume$1M
Capitalization11.08B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$36.06
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Volume$144.83K
Capitalization2.77B
EWBC vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EWBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EWBC vs. IFS commentary
Jun 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWBC is a StrongBuy and IFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 20, 2025
Stock price -- (EWBC: $93.61 vs. IFS: $36.06)
Brand notoriety: EWBC and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EWBC: 115% vs. IFS: 61%
Market capitalization -- EWBC: $11.08B vs. IFS: $2.77B
EWBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.08B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EWBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EWBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than EWBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EWBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EWBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the short-term than EWBC.

Price Growth

EWBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.20% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

EWBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.06% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWBC($11.1B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). IFS (9.76) and EWBC (9.54) have similar P/E ratio . IFS YTD gains are higher at: 26.842 vs. EWBC (-0.988). EWBC has less debt than IFS: EWBC (4.76B) vs IFS (10.4B). IFS has higher revenues than EWBC: IFS (6.82B) vs EWBC (2.56B).
EWBCIFSEWBC / IFS
Capitalization11.1B2.77B400%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.98826.842-4%
P/E Ratio9.549.7698%
Revenue2.56B6.82B38%
Total Cash445MN/A-
Total Debt4.76B10.4B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EWBC vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
EWBC
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
775
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3033
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2338
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as EWBC (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

EWBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (33) in the null industry. This means that EWBC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as EWBC (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EWBC (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

EWBC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (38) in the null industry. This means that EWBC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWBCIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JACAX52.070.08
+0.15%
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Instl
FIVFX31.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity International Capital Apprec
HEOSX16.83N/A
N/A
Hartford Climate Opportunities R4
PPAJX21.56N/A
N/A
GMO U.S. Opportunistic Value R6
FBONX35.67-0.01
-0.03%
American Funds American Balanced 529-F-3

EWBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWBC has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWBC jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWBC
1D Price
Change %
EWBC100%
+2.13%
SNV - EWBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
FNB - EWBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
WTFC - EWBC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
PNFP - EWBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
ASB - EWBC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
-0.08%
BAP - IFS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
BSAC - IFS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
BCH - IFS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CIB - IFS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
EWBC - IFS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
More