EWC | VNM | EWC / VNM | |
Gain YTD | -1.886 | -0.174 | 1,083% |
Net Assets | 2.41B | 352M | 685% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.70 | 71% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 55.00 | 7% |
Yield | 2.21 | 0.00 | - |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
EWC | VNM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago85% | 9 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.