EWC | VNM | EWC / VNM | |
Gain YTD | 18.258 | 49.652 | 37% |
Net Assets | 3.08B | 554M | 556% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.68 | 74% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 21.00 | 19% |
Yield | 1.86 | 0.00 | - |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
EWC | VNM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 3 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago85% | 5 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago81% | 10 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and VRE have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and VRE's prices will move in lockstep.