EWC | VNM | EWC / VNM | |
Gain YTD | 14.333 | -9.133 | -157% |
Net Assets | 2.88B | 439M | 656% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 6.00 | 55.00 | 11% |
Yield | 2.17 | 4.89 | 44% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
EWC | VNM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago84% | 10 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 6 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.