EWG | FLGB | EWG / FLGB | |
Gain YTD | 35.179 | 19.235 | 183% |
Net Assets | 2.87B | 790M | 363% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 10.13 | 30% |
Yield | 1.81 | 3.77 | 48% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
EWG | FLGB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 8 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago82% | 12 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGB has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGB jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB | 100% | +0.29% | ||
NWG - FLGB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
SHEL - FLGB | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
RIO - FLGB | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
CCEP - FLGB | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
HL - FLGB | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.57% | ||
More |