EWG | GXG | EWG / GXG | |
Gain YTD | 16.530 | 20.614 | 80% |
Net Assets | 2.03B | 87.3M | 2,320% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.62 | 81% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 38.17 | 8% |
Yield | 2.05 | 5.10 | 40% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
EWG | GXG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago83% | 8 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 5 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXG has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXG jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GXG | 100% | +1.74% | ||
CIB - GXG | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
GPRK - GXG | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
AVAL - GXG | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
EC - GXG | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
TGLS - GXG | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
More |