EWW | FLGR | EWW / FLGR | |
Gain YTD | 11.042 | 12.915 | 85% |
Net Assets | 1.48B | 28.3M | 5,244% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 11.00 | 4.21 | 261% |
Yield | 2.15 | 2.79 | 77% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
EWW | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWW | 100% | -1.65% | ||
OMAB - EWW | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
AC - EWW | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.40% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLGR and NEM have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLGR and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLGR | 100% | -0.89% | ||
NEM - FLGR | 11% Poorly correlated | -5.74% | ||
BNR - FLGR | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
MTX - FLGR | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
ALV - FLGR | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
MRK - FLGR | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.08% | ||
More |