Ad is loading...
EWW vs GXG
EWW vs GXG Comparison
Open Charts EWW vs GXG
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
Price$48.43
Change-$1.19 (-2.40%)
Volume$18.58K
CapitalizationN/A
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
Price$23.49
Change-$0.54 (-2.25%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
EWW vs GXG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWW vs. GXG commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWW is a Hold and GXG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWW has more net assets: 1.06B vs. GXG (35.7M). GXG has a higher annual dividend yield than EWW: GXG (5.673) vs EWW (-23.924). EWW was incepted earlier than GXG: EWW (29 years) vs GXG (16 years). GXG has a higher turnover EWW (11.00) vs EWW (11.00).
| EWW | GXG | EWW / GXG | |
| Gain YTD | -23.924 | 5.673 | -422% |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 35.7M | 2,980% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 50.35 | 22% |
| Yield | 2.15 | 6.48 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWW | GXG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 89% | 24 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EWW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWW | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| OMAB - EWW | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| AC - EWW | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.16% |
GXG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXG has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXG jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXG | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| CIB - GXG | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| GPRK - GXG | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| AVAL - GXG | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| EC - GXG | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| TGLS - GXG | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.93% | ||
More | ||||