EWY
Price
$213.00
Change
-$1.53 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
25.17B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MKOR
Price
$67.68
Change
-$0.73 (-1.07%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:51 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
154.22M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWY vs MKOR

Header iconEWY vs MKOR Comparison
Open Charts EWY vs MKORBanner chart's image
EWY vs MKOR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) vs. Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) offers low-cost passive exposure to a broad basket of large- and mid-cap South Korean equities via the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) employs active management for a more concentrated portfolio.
  • EWY maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.59% compared with MKOR’s 0.79%, providing a structural cost advantage for long-term investors seeking efficient South Korea exposure.
  • Both ETFs exhibit heavy allocations to technology and industrials sectors, reflecting South Korea’s export-driven economy dominated by electronics, semiconductors, and automotive manufacturing.
  • EWY typically holds 80–90 securities for greater diversification, whereas MKOR’s active approach results in fewer holdings (approximately 40–50), potentially increasing idiosyncratic risk.
  • Structural differences position EWY as a core beta vehicle and MKOR as a satellite active strategy, with the former offering broader market representation and the latter allowing for manager-driven stock selection.
  • In the current environment of semiconductor demand cycles and global trade dynamics, relative positioning hinges on cost efficiency and diversification rather than short-term price movements.

Introduction

South Korea’s equity market remains a focal point for investors seeking exposure to global technology supply chains and export-oriented growth. The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) both target this market but pursue distinct strategies. EWY provides low-cost, rules-based replication of a broad index, while MKOR uses active management to select a narrower set of holdings. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they represent complementary approaches for investors seeking South Korea exposure within diversified portfolios.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) Overview

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index. The index measures the performance of large- and mid-capitalization companies in South Korea while applying capping constraints to enhance diversification. The fund typically holds 80–90 securities and features an expense ratio of 0.59%. Top holdings generally include Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and Hyundai Motor, with technology comprising the largest sector allocation (approximately 50–60%), followed by industrials (around 18–20%) and financials. As a non-leveraged, market-cap-weighted passive vehicle, EWY rebalances in line with its underlying index methodology and offers high liquidity through its established structure.

Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) Overview

The Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) is an actively managed fund that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of its assets in common and preferred stocks of South Korean companies. With an expense ratio of 0.79%, the fund maintains a more concentrated portfolio of roughly 40–50 holdings. Top positions often overlap with broad-market names such as Samsung Electronics but reflect active selection. Sector exposures remain similar to the broader market, with technology and industrials dominant. As an active strategy, MKOR features higher turnover potential and aims to differentiate through fundamental research rather than index replication.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

South Korea’s equity market is heavily influenced by global semiconductor demand, automotive exports, and supply-chain dynamics within the technology sector. Macroeconomic drivers include interest-rate expectations in major economies, trade policies affecting electronics and memory-chip producers, and capital flows into emerging Asia. Regulatory developments around corporate governance and dividend policies in South Korea continue to shape investor sentiment. Sector risks center on cyclical exposure to global technology spending and geopolitical tensions that could disrupt export markets. These factors affect both passive and active vehicles targeting the region, with broader economic cycles and earnings trends in key holdings serving as primary performance drivers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have reflected the performance characteristics of South Korean equities, which tend to exhibit elevated volatility due to their concentration in cyclical technology and industrials sectors. EWY’s broader diversification has historically delivered returns closely aligned with the MSCI Korea benchmark, while MKOR’s active approach introduces potential for outperformance or underperformance depending on stock-selection efficacy. In periods of sector rotation favoring large-cap technology leaders, the passive structure of EWY may provide more consistent beta exposure. Conversely, MKOR’s concentrated holdings could amplify gains or losses during earnings cycles of select companies. Relative positioning favors cost-efficient, diversified exposure for core allocations and active management for investors seeking differentiated outcomes within the same thematic universe.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking South Korea-focused ideas or broader ETF comparisons can leverage the platform to refine their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). The lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 80–90 holdings, and passive index-tracking methodology provide a more efficient and scalable exposure profile relative to the active, higher-cost alternative. While MKOR offers potential for differentiated returns through active selection, the cost-efficiency and risk-mitigation attributes of EWY align more closely with durable factors such as structural strength and consistent sector momentum exposure in probabilistic assessments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWY vs. MKOR commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWY is a Hold and MKOR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWY has more net assets: 25.2B vs. MKOR (154M). EWY has a higher annual dividend yield than MKOR: EWY (119.050) vs MKOR (96.844). EWY was incepted earlier than MKOR: EWY (26 years) vs MKOR (16 years). EWY (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MKOR (0.79). MKOR has a higher turnover EWY (49.00) vs EWY (49.00).
EWYMKOREWY / MKOR
Gain YTD119.05096.844123%
Net Assets25.2B154M16,364%
Total Expense Ratio0.590.7975%
Turnover49.0069.9370%
Yield0.991.3673%
Fund Existence26 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWYMKOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MKOR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSMD35.010.10
+0.29%
Congress SMid Growth ETF
QBUF30.68N/A
-0.01%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffr ETF - Qt
EMTL42.78-0.04
-0.09%
State Street® DoubleLine® EM Fxd IncETF
IMTM53.27-0.21
-0.39%
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
IDYN30.60-0.20
-0.64%
iShares Intl Eq Fac Rotation Act ETF

MKOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKOR and CPNG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKOR and CPNG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKOR
1D Price
Change %
MKOR100%
-0.99%
CPNG - MKOR
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%