Ad is loading...
EWY vs QAT
EWY vs QAT Comparison
Open Charts EWY vs QAT
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
Price$54.12
Change-$1.56 (-2.80%)
Volume$20.42K
Net Assets3.24B
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
Price$18.09
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
Volume$200
Net Assets65.62M
EWY vs QAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWY vs. QAT commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWY is a Hold and QAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWY has more net assets: 3.24B vs. QAT (65.6M). EWY has a higher annual dividend yield than QAT: EWY (9.412) vs QAT (0.781). EWY was incepted earlier than QAT: EWY (25 years) vs QAT (11 years). EWY (0.59) and QAT (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . QAT has a higher turnover EWY (18.00) vs EWY (18.00).
| EWY | QAT | EWY / QAT | |
| Gain YTD | 9.412 | 0.781 | 1,205% |
| Net Assets | 3.24B | 65.6M | 4,933% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 27.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 2.37 | 5.84 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWY | QAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QAT and MARK have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QAT and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QAT | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| MARK - QAT | 14% Poorly correlated | +10.23% | ||
| ABL - QAT | -0% Poorly correlated | -1.46% |