Ad is loading...
EXBAX vs HBLFX
EXBAX vs HBLFX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$13.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.16M
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.53B
EXBAX vs HBLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Hold and HBLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. EXBAX (292M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLFX (3.69) vs EXBAX (2.33). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLFX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLFX (8 years). EXBAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. EXBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: EXBAX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.37 vs. EXBAX (2.95). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.74 vs. EXBAX (8.11).
| EXBAX | HBLFX | EXBAX / HBLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.56 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.56 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.571 | 0.108 | -1,451% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 11.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 3.69 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.95 | 4.37 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.79 | 4.32 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.11 | 16.74 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers