Ad is loading...
EXBAX vs HBLFX
EXBAX vs HBLFX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$14.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.45M
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.28
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
EXBAX vs HBLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and HBLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. EXBAX (299M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLFX (3.73) vs EXBAX (2.32). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLFX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLFX (8 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. EXBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: EXBAX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). EXBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. HBLFX (3.13). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.85 vs. EXBAX (10.42).
| EXBAX | HBLFX | EXBAX / HBLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.56 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.56 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.571 | 1.746 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 11.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 3.73 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 3.13 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.96 | 10.13 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.42 | 19.85 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers