Ad is loading...
EXBAX vs HBLFX
EXBAX vs HBLFX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$14.19
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.27M
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.38
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.07B
EXBAX vs HBLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLFX commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Hold and HBLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. EXBAX (321M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLFX (3.67) vs EXBAX (2.23). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLFX: EXBAX (31 years) vs HBLFX (8 years). HBLFX (57.00) and EXBAX (56.00) have comparable annual turnover. EXBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: EXBAX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. EXBAX (5.87). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.83 vs. EXBAX (8.30).
| EXBAX | HBLFX | EXBAX / HBLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.143 | 1.410 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321M | 12.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 3.67 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.87 | 6.31 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.79 | 1.34 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.30 | 9.83 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers