Ad is loading...
EXBAX vs HBLTX
EXBAX vs HBLTX Comparison
Open Charts EXBAX vs HBLTX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
Price$14.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.45M
Hartford Balanced Income R5
Price$14.38
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
EXBAX vs HBLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXBAX vs. HBLTX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXBAX is a Buy and HBLTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLTX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. EXBAX (299M). HBLTX pays higher dividends than EXBAX: HBLTX (3.60) vs EXBAX (2.32). EXBAX was incepted earlier than HBLTX: EXBAX (32 years) vs HBLTX (15 years). EXBAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HBLTX (0.66). HBLTX (61.00) and EXBAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXBAX: HBLTX (0) vs EXBAX (2000). EXBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. HBLTX (3.07). HBLTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.40 vs. EXBAX (10.42).
| EXBAX | HBLTX | EXBAX / HBLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.66 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.66 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.571 | 1.706 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 11.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 3.60 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 3.07 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.96 | 9.87 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.42 | 19.40 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.47 | 35.05 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers