Ad is loading...
EXOSX vs RERBX
EXOSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts EXOSX vs RERBX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series I
Price$31.78
Change-$0.48 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.6M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$48.97
Change+$0.09 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.3B
EXOSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXOSX vs. RERBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXOSX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. EXOSX (329M). EXOSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: EXOSX (1.24) vs RERBX (0.48). EXOSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: EXOSX (23 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than EXOSX (0.80). EXOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERBX (30.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXOSX: RERBX (250) vs EXOSX (1000000). EXOSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.36 vs. RERBX (-11.18). EXOSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.02 vs. RERBX (15.29).
| EXOSX | RERBX | EXOSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.56 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.530 | -3.874 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329M | 116B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.48 | 257% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | -11.18 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.25 | -5.59 | -130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.02 | 15.29 | 392% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.38 | 0.05 | 119,046% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...