EXXAF vs WHITF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXXAF is a Hold and WHITF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EXXAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWHITF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EXXAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WHITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
EXXAF (@Coal) experienced а -7.05% price change this week, while WHITF (@Coal) price change was -5.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.61%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Coal (-0.60% weekly)Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
| EXXAF | WHITF | EXXAF / WHITF | |
| Capitalization | 2.22B | 3.87B | 57% |
| EBITDA | 21.2B | 5.1B | 416% |
| Gain YTD | -13.685 | -16.373 | 84% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.78 | 1.96 | 142% |
| Revenue | 40B | 7.29B | 549% |
| Total Cash | 11.2B | 107M | 10,467% |
| Total Debt | 10.1B | 1.03B | 985% |
WHITF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TISWX | 49.19 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen S&P 500 Index W | |||
| WXCIX | 12.99 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| William Blair Emerg Mkts ex China Gr I | |||
| TSVCX | 12.37 | -0.10 | -0.80% |
| Timothy Plan Small Cap Value C | |||
| SUSYX | 16.45 | -0.15 | -0.90% |
| SEI US Managed Volatility Y (SIMT) | |||
| GSWPX | 25.22 | -0.49 | -1.91% |
| Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P | |||
EXXAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EXXAF and TBNGY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EXXAF and TBNGY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EXXAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXXAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TBNGY - EXXAF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WHITF - EXXAF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.50% | ||
| YZCAY - EXXAF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| PTIZF - EXXAF | 3% Poorly correlated | +19.29% | ||
| PADEF - EXXAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WHITF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHITF has been loosely correlated with HCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHITF jumps, then HCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WHITF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHITF | 100% | -1.50% | ||
| HCC - WHITF | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| BTU - WHITF | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| ARCH - WHITF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| AMR - WHITF | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| CSUAY - WHITF | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.48% | ||
More | ||||