It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EZFL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFMD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFMD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
EZFL (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.51% price change this week, while LFMD (@Packaged Software) price change was +16.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
EZFL is expected to report earnings on Aug 22, 2023.
LFMD is expected to report earnings on Apr 08, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
EZFL | LFMD | EZFL / LFMD | |
Capitalization | 7.86M | 399M | 2% |
EBITDA | -10.84M | -7.89M | 137% |
Gain YTD | -24.895 | -15.621 | 159% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 22.4M | 153M | 15% |
Total Cash | 405K | 33.1M | 1% |
Total Debt | 5.09M | 18.9M | 27% |
LFMD | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFMD | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
OEGIX | 37.55 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth R6 | |||
JIVZX | 32.89 | N/A | N/A |
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val R2 | |||
RAZCX | 10.64 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Growth Strat C | |||
TRIIX | 4.89 | -0.01 | -0.20% |
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income I | |||
LMORX | 38.24 | -0.38 | -0.98% |
Patient Opportunity R |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EZFL and ATCH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EZFL and ATCH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EZFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EZFL | 100% | -1.61% | ||
ATCH - EZFL | 24% Poorly correlated | -12.30% | ||
EVTC - EZFL | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.93% | ||
LFMD - EZFL | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
TIXT - EZFL | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.59% | ||
TCX - EZFL | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LFMD and BLZE have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFMD and BLZE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFMD | 100% | -2.30% | ||
BLZE - LFMD | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
PRVA - LFMD | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.32% | ||
DJCO - LFMD | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.64% | ||
NRC - LFMD | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
LYFT - LFMD | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
More |