EZPW
Price
$13.29
Change
-$0.25 (-1.85%)
Updated
Mar 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
624.89M
57 days until earnings call
NAVI
Price
$13.46
Change
-$0.45 (-3.24%)
Updated
Mar 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.92B
56 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EZPW vs NAVI

Header iconEZPW vs NAVI Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs NAVIBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$13.29
Change-$0.25 (-1.85%)
Volume$8.57K
Capitalization624.89M
Navient
Price$13.46
Change-$0.45 (-3.24%)
Volume$23.48K
Capitalization1.92B
EZPW vs NAVI Comparison Chart
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAVI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. NAVI commentary
Mar 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a StrongBuy and NAVI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 05, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $13.53 vs. NAVI: $13.92)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and NAVI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 87% vs. NAVI: 98%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $624.89M vs. NAVI: $1.92B
EZPW [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $624.89M. NAVI’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNAVI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NAVI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAVI is a better buy in the long-term than EZPW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAVI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NAVI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAVI is a better buy in the short-term than EZPW.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while NAVI (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

NAVI is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-3.46% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAVI($1.92B) has a higher market cap than EZPW($625M). EZPW has higher P/E ratio than NAVI: EZPW (13.89) vs NAVI (9.21). EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 10.728 vs. NAVI (4.740). EZPW has less debt than NAVI: EZPW (607M) vs NAVI (57.3B). NAVI has higher revenues than EZPW: NAVI (1.28B) vs EZPW (1.09B).
EZPWNAVIEZPW / NAVI
Capitalization625M1.92B33%
EBITDA168MN/A-
Gain YTD10.7284.740226%
P/E Ratio13.899.21151%
Revenue1.09B1.28B85%
Total Cash219MN/A-
Total Debt607M57.3B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs NAVI: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
NAVI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
797
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
768
SMR RATING
1..100
6412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAVI's Valuation (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (76). This means that NAVI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAVI (68). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAVI’s over the last 12 months.

NAVI's SMR Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (64). This means that NAVI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as NAVI (60). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to NAVI’s over the last 12 months.

NAVI's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (59). This means that NAVI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWNAVI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAVI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSUAX40.29N/A
N/A
Rational Dynamic Brands A
GIRNX28.61N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG Inv
MLRKX22.12N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core K
ANEFX60.79-1.12
-1.81%
American Funds New Economy A
WGMVX3.93-0.09
-2.24%
Wasatch Micro Cap Value Institutional

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
-1.66%
FCFS - EZPW
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
UPBD - EZPW
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.49%
ENVA - EZPW
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
PRAA - EZPW
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
NAVI - EZPW
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More