EZPW
Price
$15.78
Change
+$0.46 (+3.00%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
624.89M
26 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$44.74
Change
-$5.84 (-11.55%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EZPW vs OMF

Header iconEZPW vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs OMFBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$15.78
Change+$0.46 (+3.00%)
Volume$1.77M
Capitalization624.89M
OneMain Holdings
Price$44.74
Change-$5.84 (-11.55%)
Volume$2.81M
Capitalization6.02B
EZPW vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. OMF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a StrongBuy and OMF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $15.78 vs. OMF: $44.74)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 197% vs. OMF: 240%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $624.89M vs. OMF: $6.02B
EZPW [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $624.89M. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than EZPW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EZPW and OMF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.20% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -11.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -4.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-4.46% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than EZPW($625M). EZPW has higher P/E ratio than OMF: EZPW (13.89) vs OMF (9.44). EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 29.133 vs. OMF (-12.573). EZPW has less debt than OMF: EZPW (607M) vs OMF (19.8B). OMF has higher revenues than EZPW: OMF (4.28B) vs EZPW (1.09B).
EZPWOMFEZPW / OMF
Capitalization625M6.02B10%
EBITDA168MN/A-
Gain YTD29.133-12.573-232%
P/E Ratio13.899.44147%
Revenue1.09B4.28B25%
Total Cash219MN/A-
Total Debt607M19.8B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
429
SMR RATING
1..100
667
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4132
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for EZPW (77). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (29). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (66). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (51). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EZPW (41). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WAFMX3.47N/A
N/A
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Inv
AMANX63.70N/A
N/A
Amana Income Investor
HWACX33.94N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
JABLX50.56N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Instl
QBDSX8.08N/A
N/A
Quantified Managed Income Investor

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
+3.00%
FCFS - EZPW
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.28%
UPBD - EZPW
38%
Loosely correlated
-9.69%
ENVA - EZPW
33%
Loosely correlated
-11.10%
OMF - EZPW
33%
Poorly correlated
-11.55%
SLM - EZPW
32%
Poorly correlated
-9.19%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-11.55%
ENVA - OMF
78%
Closely correlated
-11.10%
COF - OMF
73%
Closely correlated
-9.96%
SLM - OMF
71%
Closely correlated
-9.19%
DFS - OMF
68%
Closely correlated
-8.34%
AXP - OMF
68%
Closely correlated
-9.97%
More