EZPW
Price
$16.32
Change
-$0.06 (-0.37%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
624.89M
One day until earnings call
SLM
Price
$27.75
Change
-$0.39 (-1.39%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
87 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EZPW vs SLM

Header iconEZPW vs SLM Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs SLMBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$16.32
Change-$0.06 (-0.37%)
Volume$5.03M
Capitalization624.89M
SLM
Price$27.75
Change-$0.39 (-1.39%)
Volume$3.23M
Capitalization4.8B
EZPW vs SLM Comparison Chart
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. SLM commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Hold and SLM is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $16.32 vs. SLM: $27.75)
Brand notoriety: EZPW: Not notable vs. SLM: Notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 403% vs. SLM: 97%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $624.89M vs. SLM: $4.8B
EZPW [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $624.89M. SLM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the long-term than EZPW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EZPW and SLM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.45% price change this week, while SLM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +3.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.36% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLM($4.8B) has a higher market cap than EZPW($625M). EZPW has higher P/E ratio than SLM: EZPW (13.89) vs SLM (8.85). EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 33.552 vs. SLM (1.068). EZPW has less debt than SLM: EZPW (607M) vs SLM (5.23B). SLM has higher revenues than EZPW: SLM (1.81B) vs EZPW (1.09B).
EZPWSLMEZPW / SLM
Capitalization625M4.8B13%
EBITDA168MN/A-
Gain YTD33.5521.0683,143%
P/E Ratio13.898.85157%
Revenue1.09B1.81B60%
Total Cash219MN/A-
Total Debt607M5.23B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs SLM: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
SLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
410
SMR RATING
1..100
658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4215
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLM's Valuation (32) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (77). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (10). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (65). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (47). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EZPW (42). This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERBIX17.550.06
+0.34%
Eaton Vance RBA Equity Strategy Fd Cl I
MDISX30.130.08
+0.27%
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Z
IEMHX9.640.01
+0.10%
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Eq A
SWMCX62.90N/A
N/A
Schwab ® US Mid-Cap Index
GSAFX22.81-0.10
-0.44%
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
-0.37%
FCFS - EZPW
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
UPBD - EZPW
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
ENVA - EZPW
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
SLM - EZPW
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
PRAA - EZPW
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

SLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLM has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLM jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLM
1D Price
Change %
SLM100%
-1.39%
SYF - SLM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
ENVA - SLM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
OMF - SLM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
COF - SLM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
NAVI - SLM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More