FA
Price
$18.24
Change
-$0.50 (-2.67%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.33B
4 days until earnings call
FCN
Price
$164.69
Change
+$1.70 (+1.04%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.4B
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FA vs FCN

Header iconFA vs FCN Comparison
Open Charts FA vs FCNBanner chart's image
First Advantage
Price$18.24
Change-$0.50 (-2.67%)
Volume$758.81K
Capitalization2.33B
FTI Consulting
Price$164.69
Change+$1.70 (+1.04%)
Volume$797.67K
Capitalization7.4B
FA vs FCN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FA vs. FCN commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FA is a Hold and FCN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FA: $18.24 vs. FCN: $164.69)
Brand notoriety: FA and FCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FA: 122% vs. FCN: 307%
Market capitalization -- FA: $2.33B vs. FCN: $7.4B
FA [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.33B. FCN’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $7.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FA and FCN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FCN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCN is a better buy in the short-term than FA.

Price Growth

FA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -8.48% price change this week, while FCN (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -12.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

FA is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

FCN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.81% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCN($7.4B) has a higher market cap than FA($2.33B). FA has higher P/E ratio than FCN: FA (61.81) vs FCN (26.99). FA YTD gains are higher at: -2.616 vs. FCN (-13.834). FCN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 420M vs. FA (211M). FCN has more cash in the bank: 329M vs. FA (214M). FCN has less debt than FA: FCN (258M) vs FA (568M). FCN has higher revenues than FA: FCN (3.49B) vs FA (764M).
FAFCNFA / FCN
Capitalization2.33B7.4B32%
EBITDA211M420M50%
Gain YTD-2.616-13.83419%
P/E Ratio61.8126.99229%
Revenue764M3.49B22%
Total Cash214M329M65%
Total Debt568M258M220%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCN: Fundamental Ratings
FCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAFCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAYWX24.03-0.10
-0.41%
Oakmark Global Select Advisor
NDVSX17.65-0.38
-2.11%
MFS New Discovery Value R2
HUSIX28.06-0.77
-2.67%
Huber Small Cap Value Inv
VWUSX72.97-2.05
-2.73%
Vanguard US Growth Investor
IJSIX16.27-0.47
-2.81%
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity I

FA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FA has been loosely correlated with ARLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FA jumps, then ARLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FA
1D Price
Change %
FA100%
-2.67%
ARLO - FA
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
GHC - FA
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
EXPGY - FA
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
BV - FA
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
ALLE - FA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More

FCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCN and CBZ have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCN and CBZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCN
1D Price
Change %
FCN100%
+1.04%
CBZ - FCN
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
MSA - FCN
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
FA - FCN
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
MMS - FCN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
RELX - FCN
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
More