Ad is loading...
FABZX vs GSGPX
FABZX vs GSGPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FABZX vs. GSGPX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FABZX is a Hold and GSGPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 4.71B vs. FABZX (519M). FABZX pays higher dividends than GSGPX: FABZX (6.26) vs GSGPX (1.15). FABZX was incepted earlier than GSGPX: FABZX (12 years) vs GSGPX (7 years). FABZX (2.53) is less costly to investors than GSGPX (0.86). FABZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.70 vs. GSGPX (179.00). GSGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FABZX: GSGPX (0) vs FABZX (100000). GSGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. FABZX (0.63). GSGPX return over 5 years is better than : 20.35 vs. FABZX (9.79).
| FABZX | GSGPX | FABZX / GSGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.73 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.53 | 0.86 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.638 | 0.502 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 4.71B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.26 | 1.15 | 545% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.63 | 3.31 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.32 | 18.34 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.79 | 20.35 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...