Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFMX vs PXOHX
FAFMX vs PXOHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFMX vs. PXOHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFMX is a Hold and PXOHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFMX has more cash in the bank: 470M vs. PXOHX (80.9M). PXOHX pays higher dividends than FAFMX: PXOHX (3.04) vs FAFMX (2.17). FAFMX was incepted earlier than PXOHX: FAFMX (11 years) vs PXOHX (36 years). FAFMX (1.59) is less costly to investors than PXOHX (0.91). FAFMX (14.00) and PXOHX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. PXOHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFMX: PXOHX (0) vs FAFMX (2500). PXOHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.62 vs. FAFMX (-3.29). FAFMX return over 5 years is better than : -5.36 vs. PXOHX (-10.53).
| FAFMX | PXOHX | FAFMX / PXOHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.91 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.91 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.184 | -2.742 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 80.9M | 581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 3.04 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.29 | -2.62 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.64 | -4.01 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.36 | -10.53 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.65 | -8.12 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement