Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FALZX vs FRORX
FALZX vs FRORX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs FRORX
Franklin Alabama Tax Free Income Advisor
Price$9.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.63M
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A1
Price$10.09
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets799.69M
FALZX vs FRORX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. FRORX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and FRORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 800M vs. FALZX (170M). FRORX pays higher dividends than FALZX: FRORX (3.40) vs FALZX (3.01). FALZX was incepted earlier than FRORX: FALZX (9 years) vs FRORX (38 years). FALZX (0.68) and FRORX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . FALZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.27 vs. FRORX (11.31). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRORX: FALZX (0) vs FRORX (1000). FRORX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.17 vs. FALZX (-0.10). FALZX return over 5 years is better than : -4.30 vs. FRORX (-5.44).
| FALZX | FRORX | FALZX / FRORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.021 | -2.247 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 800M | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 3.40 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.10 | 0.17 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.76 | 1.01 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.30 | -5.44 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement