FAMDF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
32.33M
GTBP
Price
$2.76
Change
-$0.34 (-10.97%)
Updated
Jul 3, 12:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAMDF vs GTBP

Header iconFAMDF vs GTBP Comparison
Open Charts FAMDF vs GTBPBanner chart's image
Futura Medical
Price$0.09
Change+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Volume$39.1K
Capitalization32.33M
GT Biopharma
Price$2.76
Change-$0.34 (-10.97%)
Volume$3.7K
Capitalization10.7M
FAMDF vs GTBP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAMDF vs. GTBP commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAMDF is a Hold and GTBP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FAMDF: $0.09 vs. GTBP: $3.10)
Brand notoriety: FAMDF and GTBP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAMDF: 553% vs. GTBP: 122%
Market capitalization -- FAMDF: $32.33M vs. GTBP: $10.7M
FAMDF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $32.33M. GTBP’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $10.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $306.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTBP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTBP is a better buy in the long-term than FAMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAMDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTBP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAMDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GTBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTBP is a better buy in the short-term than FAMDF.

Price Growth

FAMDF (@Biotechnology) experienced а -30.00% price change this week, while GTBP (@Biotechnology) price change was -7.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +6.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTBP is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+6.91% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAMDF($32.3M) has a higher market cap than GTBP($10.7M). GTBP YTD gains are higher at: 1.508 vs. FAMDF (-76.053).
FAMDFGTBPFAMDF / GTBP
Capitalization32.3M10.7M302%
EBITDAN/A-12M-
Gain YTD-76.0531.508-5,043%
P/E Ratio16.17N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A2.37M-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAMDF vs GTBP: Fundamental Ratings
FAMDF
GTBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8525
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTBP's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FAMDF (55). This means that GTBP’s stock grew similarly to FAMDF’s over the last 12 months.

GTBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FAMDF (100). This means that GTBP’s stock grew similarly to FAMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FAMDF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBP (100). This means that FAMDF’s stock grew similarly to GTBP’s over the last 12 months.

GTBP's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAMDF (97). This means that GTBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FAMDF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBP (100). This means that FAMDF’s stock grew similarly to GTBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAMDFGTBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTWF0.080.01
+8.97%
Sharc International Systems Inc.
SGSOF104.003.93
+3.93%
SGS SA
AOXY0.07N/A
N/A
Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc.
CPBLF11.00N/A
N/A
ALS Ltd.
SRRTF10.45-0.25
-2.33%
SLATE GROCERY REIT

FAMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAMDF and GOVX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAMDF and GOVX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAMDF
1D Price
Change %
FAMDF100%
+30.00%
GOVX - FAMDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
GTBP - FAMDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.94%
HSITF - FAMDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSTC - FAMDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELVAF - FAMDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GTBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBP has been loosely correlated with SLGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTBP jumps, then SLGL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTBP
1D Price
Change %
GTBP100%
-8.94%
SLGL - GTBP
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
RAPT - GTBP
33%
Poorly correlated
+9.48%
AMRN - GTBP
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
MDGL - GTBP
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
VKTX - GTBP
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
More