FANH
Price
$1.59
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
32 days until earnings call
MMC
Price
$227.91
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

FANH vs MMC

Header iconFANH vs MMC Comparison
Open Charts FANH vs MMCBanner chart's image
Fanhua
Price$1.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$170.44K
CapitalizationN/A
Marsh & McLennan Companies
Price$227.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.81M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FANH vs MMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FANH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FANH vs. MMC commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANH is a Hold and MMC is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FANH: $1.59 vs. MMC: $227.91)
Brand notoriety: FANH and MMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANH: 49% vs. MMC: 119%
Market capitalization -- FANH: $269.5M vs. MMC: $100.63B
FANH [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $269.5M. MMC’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $100.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $21.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FANH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMC is a better buy in the long-term than FANH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMC is a better buy in the short-term than FANH.

Price Growth

FANH (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -17.40% price change this week, while MMC (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANH is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

MMC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (+1.66% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMC($101B) has a higher market cap than FANH($270M). MMC has higher P/E ratio than FANH: MMC (27.08) vs FANH (4.96). MMC YTD gains are higher at: 22.046 vs. FANH (-76.090). MMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.32B vs. FANH (424M). MMC has more cash in the bank: 3.36B vs. FANH (1.5B). FANH has less debt than MMC: FANH (304M) vs MMC (15.4B). MMC has higher revenues than FANH: MMC (22.7B) vs FANH (3.36B).
FANHMMCFANH / MMC
Capitalization270M101B0%
EBITDA424M6.32B7%
Gain YTD-76.09022.046-345%
P/E Ratio4.9627.0818%
Revenue3.36B22.7B15%
Total Cash1.5B3.36B45%
Total Debt304M15.4B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANH vs MMC: Fundamental Ratings
FANH
MMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2464
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
5631
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9872
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
185

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANH's Valuation (35) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMC (92) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FANH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMC’s over the last 12 months.

MMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FANH (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MMC’s stock grew significantly faster than FANH’s over the last 12 months.

MMC's SMR Rating (31) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FANH (56) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MMC’s stock grew similarly to FANH’s over the last 12 months.

MMC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FANH (60) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MMC’s stock grew similarly to FANH’s over the last 12 months.

MMC's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FANH (98) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MMC’s stock grew similarly to FANH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANHMMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FANH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

FANH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANH and BRO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANH and BRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANH
1D Price
Change %
FANH100%
-3.05%
BRO - FANH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
EHTH - FANH
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.22%
SLQT - FANH
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
HUIZ - FANH
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
AJG - FANH
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More

MMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMC has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMC jumps, then AON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMC
1D Price
Change %
MMC100%
+0.82%
AON - MMC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
AJG - MMC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
BRO - MMC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
WTW - MMC
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
ERIE - MMC
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More