Ad is loading...
FAOTX vs RBEHX
FAOTX vs RBEHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOTX vs. RBEHX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOTX is a Hold and RBEHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAOTX (14.8B) and RBEHX (14.8B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FAOTX pays higher dividends than RBEHX: FAOTX (2.64) vs RBEHX (2.22). FAOTX was incepted earlier than RBEHX: FAOTX (11 years) vs RBEHX (11 years). RBEHX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FAOTX (0.66). FAOTX (5.00) and RBEHX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FAOTX (250) and RBEHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FAOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. RBEHX (6.53). FAOTX return over 5 years is better than : 20.09 vs. RBEHX (17.85).
| FAOTX | RBEHX | FAOTX / RBEHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.10 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.10 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.406 | 2.280 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 14.8B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.22 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 6.53 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.09 | 10.85 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.09 | 17.85 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.26 | 24.12 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...