Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAPIX vs NWEBX
FAPIX vs NWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAPIX vs. NWEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAPIX is a Hold and NWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. NWEBX (219M). FAPIX (3.20) and NWEBX (3.11) have matching dividends . FAPIX was incepted earlier than NWEBX: FAPIX (5 years) vs NWEBX (18 years). NWEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FAPIX (0.05). NWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.87 vs. FAPIX (18.00). NWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAPIX: NWEBX (0) vs FAPIX (2000000000). FAPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. NWEBX (0.84). FAPIX return over 5 years is better than : 12.98 vs. NWEBX (2.14).
| FAPIX | NWEBX | FAPIX / NWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.21 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.21 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.340 | 5.071 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 219M | 784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 3.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 0.84 | 844% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 8.32 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.98 | 2.14 | 606% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement