Ad is loading...
FAPIX vs NWEBX
FAPIX vs NWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAPIX vs. NWEBX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAPIX is a Hold and NWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. NWEBX (219M). FAPIX (3.19) and NWEBX (3.17) have matching dividends . FAPIX was incepted earlier than NWEBX: FAPIX (5 years) vs NWEBX (18 years). NWEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FAPIX (0.05). NWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.87 vs. FAPIX (12.00). NWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAPIX: NWEBX (0) vs FAPIX (2000000000). FAPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.52 vs. NWEBX (-0.18).
| FAPIX | NWEBX | FAPIX / NWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.21 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.21 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.398 | 2.526 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 219M | 779% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.17 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | -0.18 | -3,631% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.20 | 3.28 | 403% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 3.99 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -7.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers