FATBB
Price
$4.58
Change
-$0.47 (-9.31%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
SSPPF
Price
$2.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

FATBB vs SSPPF

Header iconFATBB vs SSPPF Comparison
Open Charts FATBB vs SSPPFBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$4.58
Change-$0.47 (-9.31%)
Volume$20.05K
CapitalizationN/A
SSP Group
Price$2.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$655
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FATBB vs SSPPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
FATBB vs. SSPPF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBB is a Sell and SSPPF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FATBB: $4.58 vs. SSPPF: $2.14)
Brand notoriety: FATBB and SSPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBB: 231% vs. SSPPF: 116%
Market capitalization -- FATBB: $83.46M vs. SSPPF: $1.73B
FATBB [@Restaurants] is valued at $83.46M. SSPPF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FATBB is a better buy in the long-term than SSPPF.

Price Growth

FATBB (@Restaurants) experienced а -18.21% price change this week, while SSPPF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +10.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +58.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

FATBB is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+10.82% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSPPF($1.73B) has a higher market cap than FATBB($83.5M). FATBB YTD gains are higher at: -10.572 vs. SSPPF (-27.553). SSPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 539M vs. FATBB (35.2M). SSPPF has higher revenues than FATBB: SSPPF (3.21B) vs FATBB (572M).
FATBBSSPPFFATBB / SSPPF
Capitalization83.5M1.73B5%
EBITDA35.2M539M7%
Gain YTD-10.572-27.55338%
P/E RatioN/A159.85-
Revenue572M3.21B18%
Total Cash16.6MN/A-
Total Debt1.44BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SSPPF: Fundamental Ratings
SSPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and FAT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and FAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
-9.31%
FAT - FATBB
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
GTIM - FATBB
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
SHAK - FATBB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
PBPB - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNNE - FATBB
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.91%
More

SSPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSPPF and PZRIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSPPF and PZRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSPPF
1D Price
Change %
SSPPF100%
N/A
PZRIF - SSPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BROS - SSPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
ALSSF - SSPPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIRZF - SSPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - SSPPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-9.31%
More