Ad is loading...
FAUTX vs FCGTX
FAUTX vs FCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAUTX vs. FCGTX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAUTX is a Hold and FCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAUTX (44.3B) and FCGTX (44.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than FAUTX: FCGTX (1.59) vs FAUTX (1.27). FAUTX was incepted earlier than FCGTX: FAUTX (11 years) vs FCGTX (8 years). FAUTX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FAUTX (6.00) and FCGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FAUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FAUTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. FAUTX (6.38). FCGTX (49.15) and FAUTX (47.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAUTX | FCGTX | FAUTX / FCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.36 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.36 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.383 | 1.515 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.3B | 44.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.59 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 6.76 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.73 | 23.72 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.12 | 49.15 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers