Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAUTX vs TLZIX
FAUTX vs TLZIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAUTX vs. TLZIX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAUTX is a Hold and TLZIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAUTX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. TLZIX (11B). TLZIX pays higher dividends than FAUTX: TLZIX (2.10) vs FAUTX (1.14). FAUTX was incepted earlier than TLZIX: FAUTX (12 years) vs TLZIX (16 years). FAUTX (0.72) is less costly to investors than TLZIX (0.17). TLZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FAUTX (6.00). FAUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TLZIX: FAUTX (250) vs TLZIX (1000000). TLZIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.23 vs. FAUTX (11.41). TLZIX return over 5 years is better than : 54.72 vs. FAUTX (37.14).
| FAUTX | TLZIX | FAUTX / TLZIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.10 | 720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.593 | 12.944 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 11B | 443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 2.10 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.41 | 13.23 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.94 | 45.56 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.14 | 54.72 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.29 | 133.89 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers