Ad is loading...
FAXDX vs RHLTX
FAXDX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAXDX vs. RHLTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAXDX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FAXDX (322M). RHLTX pays higher dividends than FAXDX: RHLTX (1.02) vs FAXDX (0.91). FAXDX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FAXDX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). FAXDX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RHLTX (0.53). FAXDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FAXDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FAXDX (0) vs RHLTX (250). RHLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. FAXDX (5.49). RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 60.20 vs. FAXDX (47.26).
| FAXDX | RHLTX | FAXDX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.53 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.53 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.310 | -1.261 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 4.23B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.02 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | 6.48 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.21 | 24.68 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.26 | 60.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |