Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAXDX vs RHLTX
FAXDX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAXDX vs. RHLTX commentary
May 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAXDX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FAXDX (335M). RHLTX pays higher dividends than FAXDX: RHLTX (1.01) vs FAXDX (0.91). FAXDX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FAXDX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). FAXDX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RHLTX (0.53). FAXDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FAXDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FAXDX (0) vs RHLTX (250). RHLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. FAXDX (7.06). RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 64.36 vs. FAXDX (51.72).
| FAXDX | RHLTX | FAXDX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.53 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.53 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.715 | 3.381 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 335M | 4.43B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.01 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 8.76 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.56 | 35.20 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.72 | 64.36 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement