Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAZZX vs MDXBX
FAZZX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FAZZX vs MDXBX
Franklin AZ Tax Free Income Adv
Price$9.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets640.4M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
FAZZX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAZZX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAZZX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. FAZZX (640M). MDXBX (3.46) and FAZZX (3.40) have matching dividends . FAZZX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FAZZX (17 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FAZZX (0.57) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FAZZX (10.60). MDXBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAZZX: MDXBX (2500) vs FAZZX (100000). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.27 vs. FAZZX (-1.87). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. FAZZX (-5.73).
| FAZZX | MDXBX | FAZZX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.49 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.53 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.057 | -2.507 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 640M | 2.25B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.46 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.87 | -1.27 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.30 | 4.59 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.73 | 0.55 | -1,037% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.83 | 11.65 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement