Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAZZX vs MDXBX
FAZZX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FAZZX vs MDXBX
Franklin AZ Tax Free Income Adv
Price$9.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets655.03M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.76
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FAZZX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAZZX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAZZX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FAZZX (655M). MDXBX (3.44) and FAZZX (3.40) have matching dividends . FAZZX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FAZZX (17 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FAZZX (0.56) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FAZZX (10.60). MDXBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAZZX: MDXBX (2500) vs FAZZX (100000). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.08 vs. FAZZX (-0.75). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.62 vs. FAZZX (-4.03).
| FAZZX | MDXBX | FAZZX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.49 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.53 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.296 | -1.777 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 655M | 2.27B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.44 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.75 | -0.08 | 918% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.00 | 7.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.03 | 2.62 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.60 | 13.01 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement