Ad is loading...
FAZZX vs MDXBX
FAZZX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FAZZX vs MDXBX
Franklin AZ Tax Free Income Adv
Price$9.49
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets666.55M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.77
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
FAZZX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAZZX vs. MDXBX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAZZX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. FAZZX (667M). MDXBX (3.35) and FAZZX (3.32) have matching dividends . FAZZX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FAZZX (17 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FAZZX (0.56) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.70 vs. FAZZX (7.72). MDXBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAZZX: MDXBX (2500) vs FAZZX (100000). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. FAZZX (1.62). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.11 vs. FAZZX (-1.70).
| FAZZX | MDXBX | FAZZX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.49 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.53 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.570 | -2.273 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 667M | 2.29B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.32 | 3.35 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.62 | 1.80 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.30 | 5.35 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.70 | 5.11 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.36 | 10.99 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers