Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBALX vs FCNTX
FBALX vs FCNTX Comparison
Open Charts FBALX vs FCNTX
Fidelity Balanced
Price$30.54
Change+$0.22 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.5B
FBALX vs FCNTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBALX vs. FCNTX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBALX is a Buy and FCNTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. FBALX (55.5B). FBALX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: FBALX (1.76) vs FCNTX (0.06). FBALX was incepted earlier than FCNTX: FBALX (39 years) vs FCNTX (58 years). FCNTX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FBALX (0.47). FBALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00). FBALX (0) and FCNTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.69 vs. FBALX (5.26). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 54.04 vs. FBALX (32.03).
| FBALX | FCNTX | FBALX / FCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.63 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.63 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 58 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.784 | 8.274 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.5B | 157B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 0.06 | 3,089% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | 13.69 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.55 | 66.75 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.03 | 54.04 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.36 | 121.98 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement