FBASF
Price
$1.42
Change
+$0.03 (+2.16%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.74B
FCXXF
Price
$13.29
Change
+$0.18 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBASF vs FCXXF

Header iconFBASF vs FCXXF Comparison
Open Charts FBASF vs FCXXFBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$1.42
Change+$0.03 (+2.16%)
Volume$37K
Capitalization5.74B
First Cap Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$13.29
Change+$0.18 (+1.37%)
Volume$11.23K
Capitalization2.36B
FBASF vs FCXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBASF vs. FCXXF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBASF is a Buy and FCXXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FBASF: $1.42 vs. FCXXF: $13.29)
Brand notoriety: FBASF and FCXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBASF: 220% vs. FCXXF: 33%
Market capitalization -- FBASF: $5.74B vs. FCXXF: $2.36B
FBASF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $5.74B. FCXXF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBASF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCXXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBASF is a better buy in the long-term than FCXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBASF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCXXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBASF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FCXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCXXF is a better buy in the short-term than FBASF.

Price Growth

FBASF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while FCXXF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBASF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.39% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBASF($5.74B) has a higher market cap than FCXXF($2.36B). FCXXF has higher P/E ratio than FBASF: FCXXF (15.95) vs FBASF (3.47). FBASF YTD gains are higher at: 42.000 vs. FCXXF (12.247). FBASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.1B vs. FCXXF (830K). FBASF has more cash in the bank: 3.51B vs. FCXXF (82.9M). FCXXF has less debt than FBASF: FCXXF (4.24B) vs FBASF (128B). FBASF has higher revenues than FCXXF: FBASF (24.6B) vs FCXXF (697M).
FBASFFCXXFFBASF / FCXXF
Capitalization5.74B2.36B243%
EBITDA39.1B830K4,710,843%
Gain YTD42.00012.247343%
P/E Ratio3.4715.9522%
Revenue24.6B697M3,529%
Total Cash3.51B82.9M4,234%
Total Debt128B4.24B3,021%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBASF vs FCXXF: Fundamental Ratings
FBASF
FCXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7133
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6670
SMR RATING
1..100
8482
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
513
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBASF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as FCXXF (46). This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as FCXXF (70). This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FCXXF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as FBASF (84). This means that FCXXF’s stock grew similarly to FBASF’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FCXXF (48). This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as FCXXF (13). This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to FCXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBASFFCXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPMX4.960.03
+0.59%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus C
JCAPX61.69N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Forty I
FSRNX16.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Index
PFGEX27.85N/A
N/A
Parnassus Growth Equity Investor
FARCX14.80N/A
N/A
Nuveen Real Estate Securities I

FBASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBASF and ABR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBASF and ABR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBASF
1D Price
Change %
FBASF100%
N/A
ABR - FBASF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
SLG - FBASF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
LAMR - FBASF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
IIPR - FBASF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
PEB - FBASF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
More

FCXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCXXF has been loosely correlated with CBAOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCXXF jumps, then CBAOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCXXF
1D Price
Change %
FCXXF100%
N/A
CBAOF - FCXXF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRRTF - FCXXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
CBL - FCXXF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
FBASF - FCXXF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNL - FCXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More