FBASF
Price
$1.30
Change
-$0.04 (-2.99%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
5.74B
SLG
Price
$59.02
Change
+$2.36 (+4.17%)
Updated
May 12, 04:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.57B
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FBASF vs SLG

Header iconFBASF vs SLG Comparison
Open Charts FBASF vs SLGBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$1.30
Change-$0.04 (-2.99%)
Volume$500
Capitalization5.74B
SL Green Realty
Price$59.02
Change+$2.36 (+4.17%)
Volume$1.22K
Capitalization3.57B
FBASF vs SLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBASF vs. SLG commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBASF is a Hold and SLG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FBASF: $1.30 vs. SLG: $56.66)
Brand notoriety: FBASF and SLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBASF: 3% vs. SLG: 87%
Market capitalization -- FBASF: $5.74B vs. SLG: $3.57B
FBASF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $5.74B. SLG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBASF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FBASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBASF is a better buy in the long-term than SLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FBASF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -7.29% price change this week, while SLG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBASF is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

SLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.87% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBASF($5.74B) has a higher market cap than SLG($3.57B). SLG has higher P/E ratio than FBASF: SLG (8.70) vs FBASF (3.47). FBASF YTD gains are higher at: 29.800 vs. SLG (-15.128). FBASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.1B vs. SLG (-206.38M). FBASF has more cash in the bank: 3.51B vs. SLG (231M). SLG has less debt than FBASF: SLG (4.42B) vs FBASF (128B). FBASF has higher revenues than SLG: FBASF (24.6B) vs SLG (914M).
FBASFSLGFBASF / SLG
Capitalization5.74B3.57B161%
EBITDA39.1B-206.38M-18,945%
Gain YTD29.800-15.128-197%
P/E Ratio3.478.7040%
Revenue24.6B914M2,691%
Total Cash3.51B231M1,519%
Total Debt128B4.42B2,893%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBASF vs SLG: Fundamental Ratings
FBASF
SLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5042
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6965
SMR RATING
1..100
8390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
574
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBASF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLG (97) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FBASF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLG’s over the last 12 months.

SLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FBASF (69) in the null industry. This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to FBASF’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SLG (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SLG (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLG (74) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FBASF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JOEIX12.500.07
+0.56%
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opps Advisor
HRIOX11.25N/A
N/A
Hood River International Opp Instl
AFMBX34.34-0.03
-0.09%
American Funds American Balanced F3
BRWCX21.98-0.04
-0.18%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq C
SAGYX130.23-0.86
-0.66%
ClearBridge Growth I

FBASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBASF and ABR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBASF and ABR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBASF
1D Price
Change %
FBASF100%
N/A
ABR - FBASF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
SLG - FBASF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
LAMR - FBASF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
IIPR - FBASF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
PEB - FBASF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More