Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBATX vs PARGX
FBATX vs PARGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBATX vs. PARGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBATX is a Hold and PARGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.92B vs. PARGX (1.2B). FBATX pays higher dividends than PARGX: FBATX (3.03) vs PARGX (2.65). FBATX was incepted earlier than PARGX: FBATX (11 years) vs PARGX (18 years). PARGX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FBATX (0.38). PARGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.60 vs. FBATX (8.00). FBATX has a lower initial minimum investment than PARGX: FBATX (250) vs PARGX (2500). FBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. PARGX (7.57). FBATX return over 5 years is better than : 23.42 vs. PARGX (2.73).
| FBATX | PARGX | FBATX / PARGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.74 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.74 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.612 | 5.789 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.92B | 1.2B | 326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.03 | 2.65 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 7.57 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.33 | 15.08 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.42 | 2.73 | 859% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.64 | 16.14 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement