Ad is loading...
FBATX vs RBATX
FBATX vs RBATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBATX vs. RBATX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBATX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBATX (3.81B) and RBATX (3.81B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBATX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FBATX (3.16) vs RBATX (2.14). FBATX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FBATX (11 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FBATX (0.38). FBATX (250) and RBATX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. RBATX (6.64). FBATX return over 5 years is better than : 21.68 vs. RBATX (16.67).
| FBATX | RBATX | FBATX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 1.38 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 1.38 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.595 | 2.269 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.81B | 3.81B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 2.14 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 6.64 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | 8.91 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.68 | 16.67 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.67 | 22.34 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...