Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBATX vs RRTLX
FBATX vs RRTLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBATX vs. RRTLX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBATX is a Hold and RRTLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.85B vs. RRTLX (1.19B). FBATX pays higher dividends than RRTLX: FBATX (3.10) vs RRTLX (2.46). FBATX was incepted earlier than RRTLX: FBATX (11 years) vs RRTLX (18 years). RRTLX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FBATX (0.38). RRTLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.60 vs. FBATX (8.00). FBATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRTLX: FBATX (250) vs RRTLX (2500). FBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. RRTLX (5.77). FBATX return over 5 years is better than : 19.80 vs. RRTLX (-0.64).
| FBATX | RRTLX | FBATX / RRTLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.99 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.99 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.104 | 3.491 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.85B | 1.19B | 323% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 2.46 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 5.77 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.16 | 7.25 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.80 | -0.64 | -3,113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.15 | 11.10 | 317% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers