Ad is loading...
FBATX vs RRTLX
FBATX vs RRTLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBATX vs. RRTLX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBATX is a Hold and RRTLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.79B vs. RRTLX (1.17B). FBATX pays higher dividends than RRTLX: FBATX (3.16) vs RRTLX (2.51). FBATX was incepted earlier than RRTLX: FBATX (11 years) vs RRTLX (18 years). RRTLX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FBATX (0.38). RRTLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.60 vs. FBATX (8.00). FBATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRTLX: FBATX (250) vs RRTLX (2500). FBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. RRTLX (5.59). FBATX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. RRTLX (2.47).
| FBATX | RRTLX | FBATX / RRTLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.99 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.99 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.855 | 0.998 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.79B | 1.17B | 323% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 2.51 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 5.59 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.00 | 4.75 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 2.47 | 914% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.00 | 6.96 | 431% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...