Ad is loading...
FBBAX vs RIDGX
FBBAX vs RIDGX Comparison
Open Charts FBBAX vs RIDGX
First Foundation Total Return A
Price$25.42
Change+$0.26 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.86M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R6
Price$25.13
Change+$0.21 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.55B
FBBAX vs RIDGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBBAX vs. RIDGX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBBAX is a Buy and RIDGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDGX has more cash in the bank: 126B vs. FBBAX (83.9M). FBBAX pays higher dividends than RIDGX: FBBAX (4.99) vs RIDGX (4.15). FBBAX was incepted earlier than RIDGX: FBBAX (32 years) vs RIDGX (16 years). FBBAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RIDGX (0.27). RIDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FBBAX (44.00). RIDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBBAX: RIDGX (250) vs FBBAX (1000). RIDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.16 vs. FBBAX (-4.35). FBBAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.06 vs. RIDGX (42.76).
| FBBAX | RIDGX | FBBAX / RIDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.27 | 452% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.27 | 452% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.632 | 3.629 | -17% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.9M | 126B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.99 | 4.15 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.35 | 10.16 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.82 | 11.17 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.06 | 42.76 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.17 | 35.63 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...