Ad is loading...
FBCTX vs TRLAX
FBCTX vs TRLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCTX vs. TRLAX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCTX is a Hold and TRLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCTX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. TRLAX (173M). TRLAX pays higher dividends than FBCTX: TRLAX (5.31) vs FBCTX (2.90). FBCTX was incepted earlier than TRLAX: FBCTX (11 years) vs TRLAX (8 years). TRLAX (0.51) is less costly to investors than FBCTX (0.39). TRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.10 vs. FBCTX (5.00). FBCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLAX: FBCTX (250) vs TRLAX (2500). FBCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.20 vs. TRLAX (3.14). FBCTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.63 vs. TRLAX (19.97).
| FBCTX | TRLAX | FBCTX / TRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.51 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.51 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.842 | 1.702 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 173M | 8,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 5.31 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 3.14 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.43 | 8.27 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.63 | 19.97 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...