Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCTX vs TRLAX
FBCTX vs TRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCTX vs. TRLAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCTX is a Hold and TRLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. TRLAX (180M). TRLAX pays higher dividends than FBCTX: TRLAX (5.11) vs FBCTX (2.76). FBCTX was incepted earlier than TRLAX: FBCTX (11 years) vs TRLAX (8 years). TRLAX (0.51) is less costly to investors than FBCTX (0.39). TRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.10 vs. FBCTX (5.00). FBCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLAX: FBCTX (250) vs TRLAX (2500). FBCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. TRLAX (3.86). FBCTX return over 5 years is better than : 20.61 vs. TRLAX (13.69).
| FBCTX | TRLAX | FBCTX / TRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.51 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.51 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.003 | 5.930 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15B | 180M | 8,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 5.11 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 3.86 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.92 | 16.41 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.61 | 13.69 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers