Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFTX vs NSFGX
FBFTX vs NSFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFTX vs. NSFGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFTX is a Hold and NSFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBFTX has more cash in the bank: 52.3B vs. NSFGX (8.55M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than FBFTX: NSFGX (2.09) vs FBFTX (1.76). FBFTX was incepted earlier than NSFGX: FBFTX (11 years) vs NSFGX (8 years). NSFGX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FBFTX (0.42). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FBFTX (7.00). FBFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: FBFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). FBFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. NSFGX (-13.24). FBFTX return over 5 years is better than : 37.78 vs. NSFGX (-2.36).
| FBFTX | NSFGX | FBFTX / NSFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.48 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.30 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.882 | -13.852 | -79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.3B | 8.55M | 611,696% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.09 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.29 | -13.24 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.30 | 3.16 | 1,085% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.78 | -2.36 | -1,601% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers