Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFTX vs NSFGX
FBFTX vs NSFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFTX vs. NSFGX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFTX is a Hold and NSFGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBFTX has more cash in the bank: 49.4B vs. NSFGX (18.2M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than FBFTX: NSFGX (2.23) vs FBFTX (1.90). FBFTX was incepted earlier than NSFGX: FBFTX (11 years) vs NSFGX (8 years). NSFGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FBFTX (0.42). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FBFTX (7.00). FBFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: FBFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). FBFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.55 vs. NSFGX (-1.68). FBFTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.21 vs. NSFGX (19.31).
| FBFTX | NSFGX | FBFTX / NSFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.53 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.52 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.592 | -3.754 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.4B | 18.2M | 271,429% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 2.23 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.55 | -1.68 | -450% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.98 | 14.59 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.21 | 19.31 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers