Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFTX vs NSFGX
FBFTX vs NSFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFTX vs. NSFGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFTX is a Hold and NSFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBFTX has more cash in the bank: 51.8B vs. NSFGX (11.9M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than FBFTX: NSFGX (2.09) vs FBFTX (1.76). FBFTX was incepted earlier than NSFGX: FBFTX (11 years) vs NSFGX (8 years). NSFGX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FBFTX (0.42). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FBFTX (7.00). FBFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: FBFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). FBFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. NSFGX (1.02). FBFTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.37 vs. NSFGX (17.54).
| FBFTX | NSFGX | FBFTX / NSFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.48 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.30 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.720 | 0.559 | 1,738% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.8B | 11.9M | 435,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.09 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.33 | 1.02 | 1,108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.54 | 23.15 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.37 | 17.54 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement