Ad is loading...
FBFZX vs RLBAX
FBFZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBFZX vs RLBAX
Franklin Managed Income Adv
Price$12.17
Change+$0.09 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.22B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.37
Change+$0.43 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
FBFZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFZX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. FBFZX (3.22B). FBFZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBFZX (4.59) vs RLBAX (1.27). FBFZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBFZX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FBFZX (0.66). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FBFZX (31.92). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFZX: RLBAX (250) vs FBFZX (100000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. FBFZX (3.09). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.54 vs. FBFZX (27.78).
| FBFZX | RLBAX | FBFZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.33 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.33 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.086 | -1.759 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.22B | 227B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.59 | 1.27 | 361% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.09 | 3.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.15 | 12.43 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.78 | 31.54 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.68 | 41.03 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...