Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs GFACX
FBGKX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs GFACX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K
Price$235.70
Change-$2.40 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.52B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.93
Change+$0.44 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.85B
FBGKX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 318B vs. FBGKX (76.5B). FBGKX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FBGKX (0.29) vs GFACX (0.00). FBGKX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FBGKX (17 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FBGKX (0.40). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGKX (22.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FBGKX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.28 vs. FBGKX (7.28). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 82.52 vs. GFACX (38.04).
| FBGKX | GFACX | FBGKX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.36 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.36 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.220 | 9.677 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5B | 318B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 8.28 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.87 | 51.23 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.52 | 38.04 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.48 | 65.05 | 350% |