Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs GFAFX
FBGKX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs GFAFX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K
Price$244.42
Change+$1.73 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.52B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$82.86
Change+$0.46 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
FBGKX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. FBGKX (76.5B). GFAFX (0.30) and FBGKX (0.29) have matching dividends . FBGKX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FBGKX (17 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FBGKX (0.40). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGKX (22.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FBGKX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.67 vs. FBGKX (10.69). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 80.48 vs. GFAFX (46.46).
| FBGKX | GFAFX | FBGKX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.229 | 12.337 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5B | 324B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.30 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.69 | 12.67 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.35 | 60.22 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.48 | 46.46 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 219.64 | 82.67 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement