Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs FCGTX
FBGTX vs FCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. FCGTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and FCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX (45.4B) and FCGTX (45.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX (1.59) and FBGTX (1.51) have matching dividends . FBGTX was incepted earlier than FCGTX: FBGTX (11 years) vs FCGTX (8 years). FBGTX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FBGTX (6.00) and FCGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FBGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (8.17) and FBGTX (8.06) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (47.82) and FBGTX (47.27) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | FCGTX | FBGTX / FCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.36 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.36 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.969 | 4.057 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 45.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.59 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 8.17 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.56 | 26.89 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.27 | 47.82 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement