Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs FCLSX
FBGTX vs FCLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. FCLSX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and FCLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. FCLSX (69.1M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: FCLSX (2.13) vs FBGTX (1.44). FBGTX was incepted earlier than FCLSX: FBGTX (11 years) vs FCLSX (8 years). FBGTX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.00). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: FCLSX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. FCLSX (6.96). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.61 vs. FBGTX (44.30).
| FBGTX | FCLSX | FBGTX / FCLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.467 | 5.221 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.7B | 69.1M | 67,583% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.45 | 6.96 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.06 | 38.52 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.30 | 50.61 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement