Ad is loading...
FBGTX vs FCLSX
FBGTX vs FCLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. FCLSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and FCLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 44.2B vs. FCLSX (66.8M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: FCLSX (2.17) vs FBGTX (1.51). FBGTX was incepted earlier than FCLSX: FBGTX (11 years) vs FCLSX (8 years). FBGTX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.01). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: FCLSX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. FCLSX (5.69). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.76 vs. FBGTX (45.11).
| FBGTX | FCLSX | FBGTX / FCLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.01 | 4,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.01 | 4,400% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.421 | 2.124 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 66.8M | 66,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.17 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 5.69 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.71 | 33.54 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.11 | 55.76 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers