Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs FHJFX
FBGTX vs FHJFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. FHJFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and FHJFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.9B vs. FHJFX (4.02B). FHJFX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: FHJFX (1.50) vs FBGTX (1.38). FBGTX was incepted earlier than FHJFX: FBGTX (11 years) vs FHJFX (7 years). FHJFX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). FHJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FHJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: FHJFX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. FHJFX (8.11). FHJFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.52 vs. FBGTX (43.01).
| FBGTX | FHJFX | FBGTX / FHJFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.47 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.47 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.681 | 9.289 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.9B | 4.02B | 1,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.50 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 8.11 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.74 | 48.67 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.01 | 46.52 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement