Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs FHJFX
FBGTX vs FHJFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. FHJFX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and FHJFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. FHJFX (3.75B). FHJFX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: FHJFX (1.57) vs FBGTX (1.44). FBGTX was incepted earlier than FHJFX: FBGTX (11 years) vs FHJFX (7 years). FHJFX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). FHJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FHJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: FHJFX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. FHJFX (8.69). FHJFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.09 vs. FBGTX (44.30).
| FBGTX | FHJFX | FBGTX / FHJFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.47 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.47 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.467 | 5.816 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.7B | 3.75B | 1,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.57 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.45 | 8.69 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.06 | 40.59 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.30 | 49.09 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement