Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs FTFFX
FBGTX vs FTFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. FTFFX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and FTFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 48.1B vs. FTFFX (2.83B). FBGTX pays higher dividends than FTFFX: FBGTX (1.38) vs FTFFX (1.02). FBGTX was incepted earlier than FTFFX: FBGTX (11 years) vs FTFFX (22 years). FTFFX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). FTFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FTFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: FTFFX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.13 vs. FTFFX (7.59). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.80 vs. FTFFX (33.65).
| FBGTX | FTFFX | FBGTX / FTFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.17 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.17 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.926 | 6.593 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1B | 2.83B | 1,700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.02 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.13 | 7.59 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.71 | 41.61 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.80 | 33.65 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.59 | 29.79 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement